ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥

The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED
==============

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to approve the following changes to 
the Governance Coordinating Committee Procedures.  The 
recommended changes clarify the role of the Governance 
Coordinating Committee in the governance structure at the 
ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥.  


	EFFECTIVE:  	Upon Chancellor's Approval


				****


Add   = 	CAPS
Delete = 	((  ))


		UAF GOVERNANCE COORDINATING COMMITTEE
				PROCEDURES


INTRODUCTION

	FACULTY, STAFF, AND STUDENT GOVERNANCE IS ESTABLISHED 
BY UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA BOARD OF REGENTS' POLICY.  EACH 
GOVERNANCE ORGANIZATION OPERATES INDEPENDENTLY, BUT WITH 
FORMAL INTERCHANGES OF INFORMATION MADE POSSIBLE BY 
REPORTS AS PART OF REGULAR MEETINGS.  FOR EXAMPLE, THE ASUAF 
AND STAFF COUNCIL PRESIDENTS ARE NON-VOTING MEMBERS OF THE 
UAF FACULTY SENATE, AND REPORT ON THE WORK OF THEIR 
INDIVIDUAL GOVERNANCE ORGANIZATIONS AT EACH MEETING OF THE 
FACULTY SENATE.  THE FACULTY SENATE PRESIDENT ALSO DELIVERS 
A REPORT ON SENATE ACTIVITIES AT EACH MEETING OF THE STAFF 
COUNCIL.  

	ISSUES CAN ARISE WITHIN GOVERNANCE THAT REQUIRE THE 
ATTENTION OF MORE THAN JUST ONE GOVERNANCE BODY.  IN SUCH A 
CASE, THE ISSUE CAN EITHER BE BROUGHT DIRECTLY TO EACH BODY 
BY AN APPROPRIATE INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP (E.G., ADMINISTRATION) 
OR IT CAN BE BROUGHT TO THE UAF GOVERNANCE COORDINATING 
COMMITTEE, WHICH IS THEN CHARGED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY.  

	THE FUNDAMENTAL OBLIGATION OF THE COORDINATING 
COMMITTEE, ONE ASSOCIATED WITH THE REASON FOR ITS CREATION, 
IS TO ASSURE TIMELY CONSIDERATION OF AN ISSUE BY EACH 
GOVERNANCE BODY AND FINAL ACTION ON THE ISSUE:  IT ACTS AS 
MONITOR OF PROGRESS AND GUARANTOR OF COMPLETION.  

	TO FURTHER AID THE COORDINATING COMMITTEE IN CARRYING 
OUT ITS OBLIGATIONS, IT ALSO SUPPORTS THE EXISTENCE OF 
CERTAIN STANDING COMMITTEES CONCERNED WITH CAMPUS-WIDE 
ACTIVITIES (SUCH AS THE HEALTH ISSUES COMMITTEE) AND 
RECEIVES REPORTS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES OUTSIDE ITS CONTROL 
WHO ARE ALSO CONCERNED WITH CAMPUS-WIDE ISSUES (SUCH AS 
THE POLICE ADVISORY BOARD).  

	THE COORDINATING COMMITTEE ALSO CREATES AD HOC 
COMMITTEES AS NEEDED TO ADDRESS PARTICULAR ISSUES NOT 
UNDER THE PURVIEW OF AN EXISTING COMMITTEE.  THE PROCEDURES 
DETAILED HEREIN DEFINE THE STRUCTURE AND WORKING OF THE UAF 
GOVERNANCE COORDINATING COMMITTEE.


	ARTICLE I   	Name

Sect. 1.	The name of this organization shall be the UAF 
		Governance Coordinating Committee


	ARTICLE II  	Purposes, Responsibilities, and Authority

Sect. 1	The purposes of the UAF Governance Coordinating 
		Committee are:

	A.	The body will exist for the express purpose of 
		coordinating unified action from the individual 
		governance bodies and ((to establish conference 
		committees)) to address issues of common concern.  
	B.	Provide a mechanism of communication between 
		the governance bodies.  
	C.	((Set up)) WORK WITH ((conference)) STANDING 
		committees to consider issues affecting multiple 
		constituencies.  The committees will report to the UAF 
		Governance Coordinating Committee ((and their 
		respective governance bodies)).  
	D.	Appoint members to ((permanent)) STANDING
		committees AS NEEDED, ensuring that there is 
		representation from each of the governance 
		constituencies((,)).  ((e))Exceptions TO COMMITTEE 
		COMPOSITION will be made when agreed upon by all 
		constituencies.  
	E.	CREATE AND APPOINT AD HOC COMMITTEES AS 
		NEEDED.
	((E))F.  The body coordinates recommendations from the 
		STANDING AND AD HOC committeeS.
	((F))G.  The body will ((recommend)) COORDINATE THE 
		REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF the academic 
		calendar((.)) UPON RECEIPT FROM THE FACULTY 
		SENATE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE.  THE 
		COORDINATING COMMITTEE WILL SUBMIT THE 
		ACADEMIC CALENDAR TO THE CHANCELLOR FOR 
		APPROVAL.    


	ARTICLE III 	Membership

Sect. 1	The UAF Governance Coordinating Committee will 
		consist of the president and president-elect, or their 
		designee, of the three governance bodies.  In the case 
		of ASUAF, the senate president will serve on the UAF 
		Governance Coordinating Committee.  (For the purpose 
		of identifying membership, the three governance bodies 
		are the Associated Students of the University of ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ 
		Fairbanks, Faculty Senate, and Staff Council.)


	ARTICLE IV 	Leadership

Sect. 1	The chairperson of the UAF Governance Coordinating 
		Committee will be elected from its members for a one-
		year term.  The election will occur at the last UAF 
		Governance Coordinating Committee meeting of the 
		academic year, WHICH MUST FOLLOW THE COMPLETION 
		OF ALL GOVERNANCE ELECTIONS.  


	ARTICLE V  	Committees

Sect. ((1))2  The ((conference)) STANDING committees of the UAF 
		Governance Coordinating Committee shall include:  

		((Academic Computer Users Committee))
		Intercollegiate Athletics Committee
		((Chancellor's Advisory Committee on Public Safety, 
		Transportation and Parking))
		Rural Affairs Committee
		UAF Grievance Council
		Health Issues

Sect. ((2))1  A.	((Conference)) STANDING committees shall have 
		at least one representative from each of the governance 
		constituencies, exception will be made when 
		agreed upon by all constituencies.
	B.	Terms of all ((conference)) committee members will 
		be one year for students and two years for faculty 
		and staff.
	C.	Committee chairs will be elected from and by the 
		respective committees.
	D.	Committee chairs shall forward committee 
		business to the UAF Governance Coordinating 
		Committee for disposition, EXCEPT WHEN LIMITED BY 
		UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA REGULATIONS.  
	E.	Policy items from the ((conference)) STANDING 
		committees must be forwarded to the individual 
		governance bodies for action.
	F.	In addition to the committees' specific charges, the 
		primary responsibility of the committees are 
		formulation and oversight of university-wide 
		policies under the purview of each committee.  
	G.	Committees will meet ((at least monthly)) AS NEEDED
		during the academic year TO FULFILL THEIR DUTIES.
	H.	The chairs of the ((conference)) STANDING committees 
		will report recommendations at the monthly UAF 
		Governance Coordinating Committee meetings.  
	
Sect. 3	((Conference)) STANDING Committees Charges

	((A.	Academic Computer Users Committee

		The charge of the Computer Users Committee shall 
		be to:

		1.	review and assess the academic computing 
			needs of the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥.
		2.	plan towards improving the academic 
			computer capabilities at the University of 
			ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Fairbanks.))

	((B.	Chancellor's Advisory Committee on Public Safety, 
		Transportation and Parking

		The charge of the Chancellor's Advisory Committee 
		on Public Safety, Transportation and Parking shall 
		be to:

		1.	review and make policy recommendations to 
			the Chancellor and UAF Governance 
			Coordinating Committee regarding campus 
			safety, security, and the transportation 
			system at UAF.
		2.	serve as an appeal board, deciding appeals 
			regarding motor vehicle citations and 
			privileges.))

	((C))A.  Intercollegiate Athletics Committee

		The charge of the Intercollegiate Athletic 
		Committee shall be to:

		1.	exercise oversight of the direction of the 
			Intercollegiate Athletics Program.  
		2.	investigate compliance with NCAA and 
			conference regulations.
		3.	participate in the evaluation of 
			intercollegiate programs

	((D))B. Rural Affairs

		The charge of the Rural Affairs committee shall be 	
		to:

		1.	oversee the general welfare of the UAF 
			community not residing on the Fairbanks 
			campus. 
		2.	monitor all activities affecting compliance 
			with the Rural College mission statement of 
			the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥.

	((E))C.  UAF Grievance Council

		The UAF Grievance Council will administer 
		grievance procedures and make recommendations in 
		compliance with Board of Regents grievance policy 
		and University regulations.

	((F))D.  Health Issues Committee

		The charge of the Health Issues committee shall be to:

		1.	address health issues which affect the work 
			environment.
		2.	coordinate efforts with the Health Center, 
			Fire Department, Risk Management, and Public 
			Safety to find solutions to health issues.

Sect. 3	Ad Hoc Committees may be established as demand 
		warrants.

SECT. 4	THE GOVERNANCE COORDINATING COMMITTEE WILL 
		RECEIVE REPORTS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES OUTSIDE ITS 
		CONTROL WHO ARE ALSO CONCERNED WITH CAMPUS 
		ISSUES.  EXAMPLES INCLUDE:  POLICE ADVISORY BOARD, 
		TECHNOLOGY BOARD, ONE-CARD COMMITTEE, AND ANY 
		OTHER COMMITTEE DEEMED RELEVANT TO FACULTY, 
		STAFF, AND STUDENTS.  


	ARTICLE VI  	Meetings

Sect. 1	The UAF Governance Coordinating Committee will ((hold 
		monthly meetings)) MEET AT LEAST TWICE A SEMESTER
		during the academic year.  


	ARTICLE VII  	Quorum

Sect. 1	A quorum will constitute at least one member from 
		each of the governing bodies.


	ARTICLE VIII  	Parliamentary Authority

Sect. 1	The parliamentary authority shall be the latest edition 
		of Robert's Rules of Order.


	ARTICLE IX  	Amendments

Sect. 1	Amendments to the Procedures require a two-thirds 
		vote from each of the three governing bodies.

Sect. 2	Amendments to the Procedures shall be forwarded to 
		the Chancellor's office for approval.





The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED AS AMENDED
==========================

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to approve the establishment of a new 
degree, the Bachelor of Arts and Sciences (BAS).  


	EFFECTIVE:  	Upon Board of Regents' Approval

	RATIONALE:  	The Board of Regents has directed campuses 
		to eliminate the Bachelor of Education in Elementary 
		Education.  The Bachelor of Arts and Sciences is designed 
		to replace this degree, by providing a content alternative 
		for the preparation of teachers, which will lead up to the 
		5th year post-baccalaureate program for teacher 
		educators.  National study groups consistently have 
		recommended that content preparation be emphasized in 
		the education of teachers, which the new degree program 
		does by preparing teachers for the breadth of knowledge 
		that they must possess in order to teach elementary 
		students.


				


				FORMAT 3

		NEW DEGREE PROGRAM REQUEST


I.  	COVER MEMORANDUM

A.  	Name of person preparing request: John Leipzig, Interim Dean 
	College of Liberal Arts

B.  	Brief Statement of the proposed program, its objectives and 
	career opportunities:
	1.  	A new degree in Arts and Sciences (BAS) which is 
		interdisciplinary in nature constructed primarily to 
		provide breadth and depth of content in those areas 
		needed for students wishing to prepare themselves to 
		teach in elementary schools.
	2.  	A general studies degree requiring a breadth of content 
		exploration in the arts and sciences available for 
		students at the extended sites as well as at the 
		Fairbanks campus.


II.  	IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROGRAM

A.  	Description of the Program
	1.  	Program Title:  Bachelor of Arts and Sciences (BAS)
	2.  	N/A
	3.  	Admissions requirements and prerequisites. Standard 
		entrance requirement for UAF.  Entrance into the Post-
		Baccalaureate Teacher Education Program would follow 
		School of Education policies and would be separate from 
		admission to the BAS.
	4.  	Course Descriptions: Except for the new interdisciplinary 
		senior seminar courses, all courses currently are 
		approved courses at UAF.  The courses selected for 
		inclusion were intended to meet ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Content 
		Standards and NCATE Content Standards (included) as 
		well as being vetted by both the Task Force and the CLA 
		Academic Council as being those courses which would 
		provide a diversified degree program in the arts and 
		sciences.
	5.  	Requirements for the degree: Attached.  Three year cycle 
		of course offerings follows the current offering cycles 
		for the departmental offerings.  All courses will be 
		offered on an annual basis.  Some extended campus 
		offerings may be offered on an every other year basis.

B.  	Program Goals
	1.  	Brief identification of objectives and subsequent means 
		for their evaluation:  Given the BOR mandate to develop 
		content based teacher preparation programs, this degree 
		will be the recommended preparation avenue for 
		elementary teachers.  Ultimately the acceptance rate of 
		teachers trained on this program as well as their 
		performance on the recently mandated teacher 
		competence tests will indicate the strength of the 
		program.
	2.  	Relationship of program objectives to "Purposes of the 
		University":  As a Land-Sea-Space Grant university, 
		UAF has the responsibility for the training of teachers.  
		This degree will provide a stronger content preparation 
		for elementary teachers as well as provide a general 
		studies degree option for students wanting a broader 
		interdisciplinary approach to higher education.
	3.  	Occupational/other competencies to be achieved: 
		Content preparation in the arts and sciences for those 
		wishing to teach in the elementary schools or to receive
		a broad based interdisciplinary degree.
	4. 	Relationship of courses to the program objectives: 
		Courses were selected because they met the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ and 
		NCATE Content Standards while providing a 
		comprehensive overall general studies degree.


III. 	PERSONNEL DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE PROGRAM

A.  	List of Faculty involved in the Program including brief 
	statement of duties and qualifications:  Faculty from CLA, 
	CSEM, CNRDM, School of Education and the College of Rural 
	ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ will cooperate in the offering of the courses.  A list 
	would include most of the teaching faculty in the university 
	since all will be involved in the content preparation of future 
	teachers.

B.  	Administrative and coordinating personnel:  The program will 
	be housed administratively in the College of Liberal Arts.  The 
	Deans of the cooperating colleges in conjunction with the 
	Director of the School of Education will provide the necessary 
	personnel to administrate the program.  A director of the 
	program will coordinate all aspects of the degree. 

C.  	Classified Personnel: Since most courses will be 
	administrated by the departments the support for those 
	courses will rest in the departments.  Support for the degree 
	will be attached to the director of the BAS program position in 
	terms of having some dedicated classified support provided by 
	the collaborating colleges and the School of Education. 


IV. 	ENROLLMENT INFORMATION

A.  	Projected enrollment/present enrollment:  Approximately 350 
	students are currently enrolled in elementary education 
	programs.  This number of students is anticipated to continue.

B.  	How determined/who surveyed/how surveyed:  Data provided by 
	the School of Education based on trend data for demand for the 
	B.Ed.

C.  	Minimum enrollments to maintain program in years 1-5.  Not 
	applicable since this will be the primary preparation route for 
	elementary teachers replacing the B.Ed.

D.  	Maximum enrollment which program can accommodate:  Again 
	not applicable since the degree is made up of a multitude of 
	disciplinary offerings.


V. 	NEED FOR PROGRAM

A.  	Required for other programs:  Will take the place of the B.Ed in 
	Elementary Education.

B.  	Employment market needs:  The ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Teacher Placement 
	Service provides a yearly comprehensive report on "Statewide 
	Educator Supply and Demand".  This document contends that 
	there will be an increasing demand for teachers in the state 
	with a large gap between jobs available and those filled by 
	UAF graduates.  Included is the 1998 report.


VI. 	OTHER

The Board of Regents directive to eliminate B.Ed. programs 
necessitates that the colleges determine content alternatives for 
the preparation of teachers, which will lead up to the 5th year post-
baccalaureate program for teacher educators.  Especially important 
is the development of an elementary program that appropriately 
prepares teachers for the breadth of knowledge that they must 
provide to elementary students.  Visiting in the life space of an 
elementary teacher provides guidance for the development of the 
present degree.


VII. 	RESOURCE IMPACT

A.  	Budget:  Currently the Provost Office and the College of Rural 
	ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ are assessing the costs of this program.  But with that 
	said and irrespective of the design, if we are to prepare 
	teachers at UAF the university ultimately has to bear the cost 
	of doing so.  To get us started CLA has committed to identify a 
	person to take on the directorship of the BAS and to work with 
	the Advising Center and the other colleges to ensure that 
	sufficient resources are available to support the programs 
	startup.

B.  	Facilities/space needs: Delightfully, I can report that no 
	additional space will be required for the program.

C.  	Credit hour production: Since the bulk of the courses are 
	disciplinary driven the credit hours will stay with the 
	disciplines offering the courses.

D.  	Faculty:  Disciplinary faculty cover courses.  A cross-
	disciplinary team will advise the director or the BAS on 
	Academic, Advising and other issues.

E. 	Library Media materials:  The structure of the degree being 
	interdisciplinary means that specialized library media are 
	unnecessary.  


VIII.	RELATION OF PROGRAM TO OTHER PROGRAMS IN THE SYSTEM

A.  	Effects of enrollments elsewhere in the system:  We intend to 
	coordinate the offerings with the BLA at UAS.  This 
	coordination will allow us to maximize delivery and minimize 
	cost.  UAA doesn't have the extensive off campus delivery 
	demand but we will be looking at this degree as well.

B.  	Does it duplicate/approximate programs anywhere in the 
	system? If so, what is the justification for the duplication:  
	Not really but if anything the BLA at UAS is the closest 
	approximation.  We will be working together to ensure rural 
	access to degrees to prepare teachers.  With this said still the 
	BAS is a more depth intensive curriculum with a greater 
	concentration in science and mathematics than the BLA.

C.  	How does the program relate to research and service 
	activities?  Service to teachers in the state is an advantage of 
	this program.  The program will provide opportunities for  
	students interested in elementary teaching to become involved 
	in the classrooms early in the degree process which certainly 
	enhances our service mission.  In terms of scholarship this 
	degree would provide the opportunity for researchers to 
	ascertain the impact of heightened content preparation in 
	terms of teacher success on competency exams and students 
	progress.


IX.  	IMPLEMENTATION/TERMINATION

A.  	Date of Implementation:  Optimistically Fall of 1999 with 
	catalog copy the following year.

B.  	Plans for recruiting students:  Will be the primary recruiting 
	tool for students wishing to be elementary teachers.  Will 
	coordinate with the Executive Director of Admissions and 
	Enrollment Management regarding student recruitment.

C. 	Termination date, if any:  This will follow the standard review 
	process for all degrees.

D. 	Plans for phasing out program if it proves unsuccessful:  If 
	required, the Provost will appoint a task force to phase out the 
	program.  

E.	Assessment of the Program:  An outcomes assessment plan 
	will include a review of student performance on the PRAXIS 
	exams.  Admission into the post-baccalureate licensure 
	program will be a further indication of successful preparation 
	of students in the program.  Additional assessment will be 
	patterned after the requirements for the NCATE self-study and 
	will lead toward accreditation of the program.  

F.	Admission to the B.Ed. program will not be suspended until the 
	B.A.S. is deliverable in rural ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥.


X:  	REGENTS GUIDELINES

The proposed BAS will provide one of the strongest content bases 
for the preparation of elementary teachers currently available in the 
states.  This degree meets or exceeds the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Content Standards 
as well as the NCATE content standards.  With the Regents directive 
of eliminating B.Ed. programs in favor of content driven preparation 
programs this is a strong response to that initiative.  Two faculty 
committees and four deans at UAF have been involved in this process 
to date and the goal is to provide a credible interdisciplinary degree 
that meets the needs for elementary school teacher preparation.  
This degree meets intent and quality requirements for a general 
studies degree which will provide an excellent content preparations 
base for future teachers.


			------------------------

		CATALOG COPY FOR THE B.A.S.

	BACHELOR OF ARTS AND SCIENCES REQUIREMENTS

Requirements....................................................................	Credits

Complete the baccalaureate core............................	38-39
	(Must complete ART/MUS/THR 200X, HIST 100X, 
	ANTH/SOC 100X, ENG/FL 200X, MATH 107X, 
	COMM 131X and two different science discipline 
	breadth-emphasis laboratory courses selected 
	from (BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY, PHYSICS, & GEOSCIENCE). 
	Two years of a non-English Language highly recommended)

Complete the following B.A.S. Arts and Sciences major 
	requirements in addition to the core:
Mathematics.........................................................................		6
	(MATH 205  and MATH 206)
Science....................................................................................		8
	(Two additional breadth-emphasis laboratory 
	courses in the two science disciplines not
	completed for the baccalaureate core)
Social sciences....................................................................		12
	(GEOG 101, HIST 131 or HIST 132, HIST 461 and PS 101)
Literature, grammar and writing...............................		9
	(ENGL 306 or ENGL 307; ENGL 317; and 3 credits 
	from ENGL 271, ENGL 272, ENGL 313, ENGL 314, J/B 311)
Psychological and language development................		6
	(PSY 240 and either LING 101 or LING 303)
Creative Expression..........................................................		3
	(An applied course or courses in Music, Theatre, 
	Photography, or Art)
Understanding diversity and culture..........................		6
	(ANTH 242 and one other approved three credit 
	course selected from a list to be developed by 
	the appropriate review committee.
Interdisciplinary senior seminars..............................		6
	(LAS 410 and either LAS 420 or LAS 430  
	Each course will be written intensive and
	1/2 oral intensive.)

Minor Complex*..................................................................	at least 15

Electives................................................................................	at least 7

Minimum credits required for degree........................		120*

Of the above, at least 39 credits must be taken in upper division 
(300-level or higher) courses.  Courses which are taken to fulfill the 
Arts and Sciences major can also be counted for content minors or 
second majors.

*Departmental requirements for minors may exceed the minimums 
indicated.  Specific requirements are listed in the Degrees and 
Programs section.


Interdisciplinary senior seminars for the B.A.S. degree:  A brief 
description

Three new courses were created (LAS 410, 420, 430) to provide a 
integrative experience across content areas tied to teaching 
practice.  B.A.S. students will be required to take the Scientific 
Research (LAS 410) course and either the Social Science Inquiry and 
Research (LAS 420) or the Humanities: Creative Activities and 
Research (LAS 430) course.  

LAS 410 covers the formulation and testing of scientific hypotheses 
using field observation and experimentation.  Students will be 
required to complete two projects one of which would involve 
working within a local K-12 school.  

LAS 420 and LAS 430 examine critical events which have shaped the 
modern world from the perspectives of different disciplines and 
differently situated actors.  Both courses examine the processes in 
the social sciences or humanities that help us make sense of our 
world and how different people hold differing worldviews.  LAS 420 
and LAS 430 have project assignments that would have students 
working on K-8 teaching assignments.  Both courses will involve 
School of Education Faculty working with College of Liberal Arts 
faculty.  

All three LAS courses have been developed to be written intensive 
and 1/2 oral intensive.  These three courses should clarify for the 
outside observer that the intent of the degree is to prepare K-8 
teachers.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED
==============

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to approve the following procedure 
regarding laguage credit for the Core Curriculum:


CREDIT FOR TESTING:  UAF will accept as language credit for the 
CORE curriculum the successful completion of accredited testing in 
languages not offered by UAF.  ONLY tests that are equivalent to the 
first two semesters of specifically LANGUAGE STUDY (5+5 or 3+3+3 
in ASL) will count toward CORE.  Other language tests and transfer 
credit will continue to be accepted for humanities credit.


	EFFECTIVE:  	Upon Chancellor's Approval

	RATIONALE:  	Currently, UAF lacks a formal procedure for 
		handling work in languages not offered as UAF, as it 
		pertains to the core curriculum option in the 
		"Perspectives on the Human Condition."  This motion 
		provides a procedure.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED AS AMENDED
==========================

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to approve the following minimum 
requirements for Master's Degrees.


Master's Degree Requirements

The ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ offers two catagories of 
master's degrees:  1) research-oriented (thesis or project) and 2) 
practice-oriented (non-thesis) master's degrees.  Research-oriented 
programs prepare graduate students for scholarly or research 
activity directed mainly toward the acquisition of new knowledge, 
while that of practice-oriented graduate programs prepare graduate 
students for professional practice directed mainly toward 
application or transmission of existing knowledge.  All degree 
requirements must be completed within a seven-year time period.  
The minimum requirements for a master' s degree at the University 
of ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Fairbanks are as follows (individual departments may have 
additional requirements):

Requirements

1. 	Formulate a unified degree program, in cooperation with your 
graduate advisory committee.  Degree programs must be composed of 
courses in the discipline or clearly related to and/or supportive of 
that discipline.  All courses to be applied toward the degree must be 
approved by the advisory committee and follow the requirements set 
forth by the department that sponsors the degree.

2. 	Specific requirements for the master's degree are:

	a. 	Submit a Graduate Study Plan (GSP), Appointment of 
		Committee form, and annual Report of Committee form 
		to the Graduate School.  It is suggested that the GSP and 
		Appointment of Committee forms be submitted by the 
		end of the first year of study.

	b. 	Be registered for at least 6 credits per year (fall, 
		spring, summer) or have an approved leave of absence 
		on file.

	c. 	Pass a written and/or oral comprehensive examination 
		which may be combined with a project or thesis defense,  
		OR in some programs (e.g. the MBA program) a capstone 
		course OR SYNTHESIZING PAPER, that includes 
		demonstration of the ability to synthesize information 
		in the field at a level appropriate for a master's degree, 
		may be substituted for a comprehensive examination.

	d. 	Submit an Advancement to Candidacy form to the 
		Graduate School.  Once submitted, this form supplants 
		the GSP and serves to formally establish specific degree 
		requirements.

	e. 	If a thesis or project is required, pass an oral defense 
		of the thesis/project.

	f. 	Submit an application for graduation and be registered 
		for at least 3 graduate credits in the semester in which 
		the degree is to be awarded.

	g. 	Complete all degree requirements within the seven year 
		time limit allowed.

Credit Requirements

	a. 	To earn a master's degree, you must satisfactorily 
		complete a minimum of 30 semester credits.

	b. 	At least [[24]] 21 semester credits, including those 
		earned for thesis and research/project, must be at the 
		600-level.  The rest may be made up of 300-400 level 
		credits.

	c. 	No 100-, 200- or 500-level credits may be applied 
		toward master's degree requirements.

	d. 	A maximum of 12 semester credits of thesis (699) 
		and/or research (698) may be applied toward degree 
		requirements.  You may enroll in more than 12 thesis 
		and/or research credits, but only l2 may be applied 
		toward your degree.  When a thesis is required, it must 
		carry 6 or more credits. In nonthesis programs, a 
		maximum of 6 credits may be devoted to research.


	EFFECTIVE:  	Fall 1999

	RATIONALE: 	The master's degree requirements, passed 
		during UAF faculty senate  meeting #71 eliminated all 
		non-thesis master's degrees except those that fall under 
		the professional category.  Eliminating these non-thesis 
		degrees has serious ramifications for students pursuing 
		master's degrees in several programs.  The intent of the 
		original motion was to set minimum standards and 
		reduce the disparity in requirements for different 
		categories of master's degrees.  In the end the motion 
		served to complicate the master's degree requirements 
		and left at least 23 master's degrees out of compliance 
		with the new requirements.  Bringing these degrees into 
		compliance would likely result in a drop in graduate 
		applications since these new requirements are more 
		stringent than those of many universities across the 
		nation.  This new motion makes minor alterations to the 
		master's degree requirements as they existed prior to 
		meeting #71 and insures that non-thesis master's 
		degrees which are a vital part of  the UAF graduate 
		curriculum will continue to be offered in a manner 
		competititve with similar programs at other 
		universities.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED 
==============


The UAF Faculty Senate moves to recommend that the Board of 
Regents change its policy 05.10.01, section I (Tuition and Student 
Fees) to enable foreign students to be exempt from the non-resident 
surcharge after their first year.  


	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately

	RATIONALE:   	Previously, foreign students at UAF were 
		treated like out-of-state students:  they paid resident 
		tuition after their first year.  The rules changed, 
		however, and now they pay non-resident tuition for all 
		their years at UAF.  This reduces foreign students' 
		incentives to attend our University, at a time when we 
		seek to internationalize our student body.  Most foreign 
		students are serious about their academic work, 
		contribute diversity to the campus community, and link 
		our programs/activities to those abroad.  Further, the 
		cost of eliminating non-resident tuition for foreign 
		students is likely to be recouped through a substantial 
		increase in the number of such students at UAF.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED
==============

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to amend the UAF Faculty 
Appointment and Evaluation Policies and Regulations for the 
Evaluation of Faculty: Initial Appointment, Annual Review, 
Reappointment, Promotion, Tenure, and Sabbatical Leave as attached. 


	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately
				Upon Chancellor's Approval

	RATIONALE:  	The Senate's motion will revise and simplify 
		the two documents of the Faculty Appointment and 
		Evauation Policies and the Regulations for the Evaluation 
		of Faculty.  The two items are now covered by the 
		collective bargaining agreement between the University 
		of ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ and the applicable bargaining union.  


				


For full documents see:

Draft UAF Faculty Appointment and Evaluation Policies (4/20/99) 
	/uafgov/www/draftpol.html

Draft UAF Regulations for the Evaluation of Faculty (4/20/99)
	/uafgov/www/draftreg.html

[[   ]]  =  Deletion
CAPS =  Addition




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED AS AMENDED
==========================

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to recommend to the Provost that the 
following administrators be reviewed on a four year cycle:


Executive Dean, College of Rural ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥
[[Director, School of Agriculture & Land Resource Management
Director, UAF Museum
Director, Institute of Marine Science
Director, Bristol Bay Campus
Director, Chukchi Campus
Director, Interior-Aleutians Campus
Director, Tanana Valley Campus
Director, Geophysical Institute]]
Dean, School of Fisheries & Ocean Sciences
[[Director of Library]]
Dean of Graduate School
[[Director, School of Mineral Engineering]]
Dean, College of Natural Resource Development & Management
[[Director, School of Management
Director, School of Education]]
Dean, College of Liberal Arts
Dean, College of Science, Engineering, & Math
[[Director, Institute of Arctic Biology
Director, Institute of Northern Engineering
Director, Kuskokwim Campus
Director, Northwest Campus
Director, ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Cooperative Extension
Director, Center for Distance Education
Director, Arctic Region Supercomputer Center
Director, International Arctic Research Center]]

(If interim administrators are still in place after four years they 
should be considered for evaluation.)

(Any other administrators will be reviewed on an ad hoc basis when 
requested by 25 percent of the faculty in their unit.)


	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately

	RATIONALE:  	The Appeals and Oversight Committee was 
		tasked during fall semester 1998 with reviewing the 
		policy for the evaluation of administrators.  The primary 
		qualification for selection for periodic review by the 
		Provost's Office was administrators holding academic 
		rank whose positions directly impact the academic 
		programs and whose performance directly affects the 
		ability of faculty to carry out their academic duties.

		The committee met at its ninth and last meeting of the 
		Spring semester and reviewed previous policy (Dec. 17, 
		1990, Mtg. #23, May 7, 1990, Mtg. #19 and Feb. 8,1996, 
		Mtg. #61) concerning evaluation of administrators.  The 
		committee recommended resubmission of the list of 
		administrative positions for periodic review based on 
		the rationale determined by previous Senate motions.   




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION PASSED
==============


The UAF Faculty Senate moves to recommend a plan for the 
evaluation of the Office of Chancellor, University of ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ 
Fairbanks.

	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately

	RATIONALE:  	The purpose of any assessment is to enhance 
		the quality and contribution of the University.  The 
		Faculty Appeals & Oversight Committee sought 
		information from other colleges regarding their 
		experience with senior officer evaluation.  The 
		Chancellor Assessment Plan is based on information 
		derived from a publication by The Association of 
		Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 
		Washington, D.C.; Presidential Assessment--A Guide to 
		the Periodic Review of the Performance of Chief 
		Executives, by John Nason, 1984.


				


CHANCELLOR ASSESSMENT


PURPOSE

The purpose of the evaluation is to enable the Board to assess the 
performance of the Chancellor.

To develop strategies to enhance strengths and correct weaknesses.

To define by the Chancellor and perceive by the President and Board 
of Regents the scope and role of the Office and the Chancellor's 
performance in it.


CHANCELLOR EVALUATION:  OBJECTIVES

Identify specific areas of institutional management that need 
improvement.

Develop evaluation procedures and foster the kind of interaction that 
would direct university resources toward educational change and 
service.

Encourage a mutually supportive relationship between the various 
governing boards and the Chancellor.

Clarify the balance between internal and external views of the 
decision making  process.

Provide the Chancellor with an assessment of the way in which s/he 
is perceived to be fulfilling the institution's expectations by 
faculty, staff, students, alumni and the public.

Support other aspects of University performance review by focusing 
attention upon management and by using evaluation as a vehicle to 
analyze institutional assumptions and priorities.


EVALUATION COMPONENTS

A conscious intent to evaluate through foresight and planning.

Appoint an individual or committee to take charge of the evaluation 
review. The committee should consist of faculty, staff, students and 
alumni.

Any review of the Chancellor's performance should take into account 
the unique characteristics of the University and its governance 
structure.

Prior to an evaluation, criteria must be explicit, understood and 
agreed to by all concerned.

Consider beginning with a self-evaluation. This may be the most 
important component of the whole process.

The Chancellor should have an opportunity to review and respond to 
the committee's report.

The committee must be sensitive to the Chancellor's legitimate 
concerns and yet insist on having the final word.

After the review committee has considered the results of the 
evaluation, it should be made public by the Chancellor's supervisor.

Time is an important factor in conducting evaluations.  An 
evaluation frequency of five years is recommended, with the 
evaluation process completed within a four month time period.


EVALUATION CRITERIA

Academic Management and Leadership:  

Demonstrates exemplary leadership and management in educational 
matters including respect for professorial evaluation procedures and 
recognition of the value of the tripartite mission (teaching, 
research, and service) of the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥.

Demonstrates: respect for academic freedom, concern about 
curriculum, concern about recruitment and retention of faculty, 
staff, and students.

Relates in a positive manner to university faculty and school 
administrators.

Generates and sustains a vision of what the University should be.

Administrative Management and Leadership

Demonstrates exemplary administrative skills that enhances the 
University's mission and purpose.  This would include:  appropriate 
staffing, delegation of authority, supervision, long-range planning, 
etc.

Demonstrates good personnel policies; a willingness to consult 
others and to act decisively when action is needed.

Ability to relate in a positive manner with labor groups.

Budget and Finance

Demonstrates exemplary practices involving university finances to 
include understanding of the institution's finances through effect 
management of its resources.

Effectively communicates the institution's budget and financial 
decisions to internal and external clientele.

Provides leadership and direction to effective financial management 
policies and procedures. Is knowledgeable and equitable in resource 
allocation.

Fund Raising

Demonstrates effective leadership in securing public and private 
funding for the tripartite mission of the University.

External Relations

Represents the University in a knowledgeable and effective manner 
to the public.

Provides leadership and recognition of important external groups 
such as:  alumni, local and state officials, and prospective students.

Provides leadership to the establishment of effective community 
relations with school boards, chambers of commerce, service clubs, 
advisory councils, and native organizations.

Internal Relations

Demonstrates impartial leadership across schools and departments.

Effectively articulates and gives direction to a vision for the 
campus.

Facilitates a positive morale.


Chancellor Self-Assessment Guidelines

A resume of expectations and objectives on assuming the office.

An assessment report that specifies the degree to which 
expectations and objectives were achieved.

Discussion of major factors which may have altered expectations 
and the manner in which these factors where addressed.

Description of mechanism used to redefine goals and objectives.

Outline and description of areas of major concern over next five 
years.

Description of possible institutional changes that might address 
areas of future concern.

Goals and objectives which the Chancellor might wish to achieve 
over the next evaluation period.


SUMMARY OF GUIDELINES FOR CHANCELLOR EVALUATION

Chancellor prepares statement of self-assessment, including the 
objectives defined upon assuming office and progress toward 
achieving those objectives.

Appointment of Chancellor evaluation committee.  Faculty Senate 
will initiate the evaluation process by forwarding a list of 
recommendations for the membership of the evaluation committee 
to the University President.

Develop plan of evaluation by which the Chancellor will be appraised.

Review the quality of leadership with University constituencies:  
administrative officers, faculty, students, and leaders of the 
community.

Evaluation committee prepares its preliminary report and submits it 
to Chancellor for response.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION 
========

The UAF Faculty Senate recommends to the Board of Regents that the 
attached list of individuals be awarded the appropriate UAF degrees 
pending completion of all University requirements.  [Note:  copy of 
the list is available in the Governance Office, 312 Signers' Hall.]


	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately

	RATIONALE:	These degrees are granted upon 
		recommendation of the program faculty, as verified by 
		the appropriate department head.  As the representative 
		governance group of the faculty, we are making that 
		recommendation.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION
========

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to endorse the 1999-2000 committee 
membership as attached.


	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately

	RATIONALE:	New Senate members' preference for 
		committee selection were reviewed and weighted 
		against membership distribution from schools and 
		colleges.


				


1999-2000 UAF FACULTY SENATE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP


STANDING COMMITTEES

Curricular Affairs
	Sukumar Bandopadhyay, CNRDM/SME (00), Chair, Curriculum 
Review
	Carol Barnhardt, SOEd. (00)
	Charlotte Basham, CLA (00), Chair
	Tom Clausen, CSEM (00)
	Dolly Garza, SFOS (01)
	Chris Hartman, CSEM (01)
	Ron Illingworth, CRA (01)
	Judy Shepherd, CRA (00)
	Janice Reynolds, CLA (00)
	  Ex-Officio:   	^Ann Tremarello, Registrar's Office
				^Ed Murphy, CSEM
				Wanda Martin, Advising Center
				vacant, Student


Faculty & Scholarly Affairs
	Alvin Amason, CLA (01)
	Susan Grigg, CLA (00)
	Bret Luick, ACE (00)
	Barry Mortensen, CRA (00)
	John Olson, CSEM (00)
	Norm Swazo, CLA (01)
	John Yarie, CNRDM/SALRM (01), Convener
	  Ex-Officio:   	^Jim Sedinger, IAB


Graduate & Professional Curricular Affairs 
	Claudette Bradley-Kawagley, SOEd. (01)
	James Gardner, CSEM (01), Chair
	Renee Manfredi, CLA (00)
	Harikumar Sankaran, SOM (00)
	Vikas Sonwalkar, CSEM (00)
	  Ex-Officio:   	Joe Kan, Graduate Dean.
				Dennis Stephens, Libraries
				Ann Tremarello, Director, A&R
				Graduate Student



PERMANENT COMMITTEES

Committee to Nominate Commencement Speaker 
   and Honorary Degree Recipients
	Larry Duffy, CSEM (00)
	John Gimbel, CSEM (01)
	Jenifer McBeath, SALRM (00)
	Trina Mammoon, CLA (01)
	Claus-M. Naske, CLA
	Non-University:  Phil Younker
	Student:  
	  Ex-Officio:   	Paul Reichardt, Provost


Core Review (Elected)
	Jin Brown, Speech, CLA (00)
	Suzanne Bordelon, English, CLA (01)
	Jerry Harrington, CSEM, Sciences (00) 
	Thomas Riccio, Humanities, CLA (00)
	Jordan Titus, Psy/Soc/SW, CLA (01)
	Jonathan Wiens, Math, CSEM (00)
	vacant, Engineering/Management (01)
	Student: 
	  Ex-Officio:   	^David Bantz, Library
			Sue McHenry, RSS


Developmental Studies Committee (Elected)
	Nancy Ayagarak, Kuskokwim, CRA (00)
	John Bruder, Bristol Bay, CRA (01)
	Lisa Buttrey-Thomas, Science, CSEM (00)
	Richard Carr, English, CLA (01)
	Jerah Chadwick, Devel. Studies, CRA (01)
	Richard Clausen, Math, CSEM (00)
	Cindy Hardy, TVC (00), Co-Chair
	Ron Illingworth, Interior Campus, CRA (01)
	Wanda Martin, Advising Center (00)
	Joe Mason, Northwest, CRA (00)
	vacant, Chukchi, CRA (01)
				, RSS (00)
	Jane Weber, TVC (00), Co-Chair
	  Ex-Officio:   	^Ruth Lister, TVC


Faculty Appeals & Oversight Committee (Elected)
	Godwin Chukwu, CNRDM (01)
	Ray Gavlak, ACE (00)
	Don Kramer, SFOS (00)
	Kristy Long, ACE (01)
	Tara Maginnis, CLA (00)
	Jenifer McBeath, CNRDM (00), Convener
	Pham Quang, CSEM, Math (00) 
	Norm Swazo, CLA (01) 
	vacant, CSEM (01)
	vacant, CRA (00)
	vacant, CRA (01)
	vacant, SFOS (01)
	vacant, SOEd. (99)
	vacant, SOEd. (00)


Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement 
	Barbara Butcher, ACE (01)
	Burns Cooper, CLA (01)
	Linda Curda, CRA (01)
	Scott Huang, SME (00)
	Tom Robinson, SOM (01) 
	Dennis Schall, SOEd. (00)
	Dan White, CSEM (00), Chair
	  ^Jim Collins, SOM
	  ^David Bantz, Library


Graduate School Advisory Committee
	John Gimbel - FS appointee (01), Convener
	Jacob Joseph - Provost appt. (00)
	Judith Kleinfeld - FS appointee (00) 
	Charles Mason - Provost appt (01)
	Brenda Norcross - FS appointee (00) 
	Roger Ruess - Provost appt (01)
	Mary Ann Sweeney - Graduate Student
	  Ex-Officio:   	Joe Kan, Graduate Dean
				Larry Duffy, Senate President-Elect


Legislative and Fiscal Affairs
	Steve Johnson, CRA (00)
	Kara Nance, CSEM (00), Convener
	Eduard Zilberkant, CLA (00)
	Wendy Redman, SW Univ. Rel.
	  ^Fred Husby, CNRDM
	  ^Bob Trent, SME 


OTHER

UAF Governance Coordinating Committee
	Larry Duffy, President-Elect
	Ron Gatterdam, President

UAF Faculty Alliance Representatives
	Larry Duffy, President-Elect
	Ron Gatterdam, President
	Madeline Schatz, Past-President




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION
========

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to authorize the Administrative 
Committee to act on behalf of the Senate on all matters within its 
purview which may arise until the Senate resumes deliberations in 
the Fall of 1999.  Senators will be kept informed of the 
Administrative Committee's meetings and will be encouraged to 
attend and participate in these meetings.


	EFFECTIVE:   	May 3, 1999

	RATIONALE: 	This motion will allow the Administrative 
		Committee to act on behalf of the Senate so that 
		necessary work can be accomplished and will also allow 
		Senators their rights to participate in the governance 
		process.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


MOTION
=======

The UAF Faculty Senate moves to adopt the following calendar for 
its 1999-2000 meetings.


	EFFECTIVE:  	Immediately

	RATIONALE:  	Meetings have to be scheduled and the Wood 
		Center Ballroom reserved well in advance.


				     **

				UAF FACULTY SENATE

					1999-2000
				  Calendar of Meetings

Mtg. # 	Date   	Day    	Time   	Type

89     	9/27/99 	Monday	1:30 p.m.	audioconference

90     	11/1/99 	Monday	1:30 p.m.	face-to-face 

91     	12/6/99 	Monday	1:30 p.m.	audioconference

92     	2/7/00   	Monday	1:30 p.m.	audioconference

93     	3/6/00   	Monday	1:30 p.m.	face-to-face

94     	4/3/00   	Monday	1:30 p.m.	audioconference

95     	5/1/00   	Monday	1:30 p.m.	audioconference/ 
								face-to-face

Location:  Wood Center Ballroom




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


			RESOLUTION  OF  APPRECIATION

					FOR

				JOAN K. WADLOW


WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow began her academic career in higher 
	education with baccalaureate and Ph.D. degrees from the 
	University of Nebraska-Lincoln; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow received a master's degree from the 
	Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has a certificate from the Graduate 
	Institute of International Studies, Geneva, Switzerland as a 
	Rotary Scholar; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has served academe as a professor of 
	political science; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has served academe as a dean, vice-
	president of academic affairs and provost; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow participated as a member of the 
	University President's Mission to Israel; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has lectured on conflict resolution for the 
	ministry of economic affairs for the government of Taiwan; 
	and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow traveled to Vietnam in November 1995 as 
	a member of one of the first official delegations to visit that 
	country after normalization of relations; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has conducted educational accreditation 
	visitations in Kenya, Zimbabwe, Britain, and Spain; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has received teaching and community 
	service awards, and has published on topics such as U.S. 
	foreign policy, international education and educational equity; 
	and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow participated as a panel member for 
	"Opening Our Own Doors:  Women and Higher Education in 
	Wyoming" at the American Heritage Center's 7th Annual 
	Symposium, "Schoolmarms and Scholars:  Women Educators of 
	the American West" at the University of Wyoming; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has served a three-year term on the 
	Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Service 
	(DACOWITS), an appointment made by the U.S. Secretary of 
	Defense; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow is past chair of the International Affairs 
	Commission of the National Association of State Universities 
	and Land Grant Colleges (NASULGC); and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow is past chair of the executive committee 
	of the Board of Directors of the Associated Western
	Universities, is a former member of the Board of Directors for 
	the National Merit Scholarship Corporation and the Commission 
	on Minorities of the American Council on Education; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has served as past-president of the 
	Northcentral Association--one of the largest accrediting 
	organizations in the world; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow is currently a member of the Commission 
	on Colleges of the Northwest Association of Schools and 
	Colleges; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow is a member of the National Collegiate 
	Athletic Association (NCAA) Division II President's 
	Commission; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow presently serves on the Board of Directors 
	of the Greater Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce, the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ 
	SeaLife Center, the Associated Western University, and the 
	Washington Center; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow received the 1998 ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Scholar 
	Achievement Award of the Rotary International Foundation; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow is a member of the Fairbanks Rotary Club, 
	the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Airlines Community Advisory Board, and a past 
	member of the Key Bank of ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Board of Directors; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has served nine years as Chancellor at 
	UAF; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow developed a long-range strategic plan to 
	lead UAF into the 21st century; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow completed a $12.1 million dollar private 
	fundraising campaign, the first ever, for the university; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow spearheaded public and private 
	partnership sectors to address ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ and arctic issues 
	aggressively; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has sought alternative funding to maintain 
	momentum for UAF during a decade of shrinking state dollars; 
	and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has demonstrated a commitment to the 
	students of UAF through these fundraising efforts; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow has shared with UAF and the Fairbanks 
	community her determined drive for excellence; and 

WHEREAS, Joan K. Wadlow will now enjoy the fruits of her career 
	through retirement with her husband Dick and her 
	Newfoundland on the Oregon Coast; and 

WHEREAS, The faculty of the ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥, through 
	its Faculty Senate, wish to acknowledge the outstanding 
	contributions to higher education of Joan K. Wadlow, the UAF 
	Chancellor; now 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the UAF Faculty Senate 
	acknowledges and proclaims to all that Joan K. Wadlow has 
	rendered outstanding service to the faculty, staff, students, 
	alumni, and administration of UAF and to the citizens of 
	ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥, and hereby expresses its deep appreciation.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


			RESOLUTION  OF  APPRECIATION

					FOR

				MADELINE F. SCHATZ


WHEREAS, Madeline Schatz has served the UAF Faculty in a manner 
	faculty; and 

WHEREAS, Madeline Schatz has served as Senator to the UAF Faculty 
	Senate from 1995-1997, as a member of the Curricular Affairs 
	Committee from 1995-97; and 

WHEREAS, Madeline Schatz has served as President-Elect of the UAF 
	Faculty Senate from 1997-1998, as a member of the UAF 
	Governance Coordinating Committee from 1997-99, as a 
	member of the UA Faculty Alliance of the UA Systemwide 
	Governance Council from 1997-99; and 

WHEREAS, Madeline Schatz has served as a member of the Provost's 
	Search Committee in 1998, as a member of the Presidential 
	Evaluation Committee of the Board of Regents in 1998; and 

WHEREAS, Madeline Schatz has served as President of the UAF 
	Faculty Senate from 1998-1999; and 

WHEREAS, The UAF Faculty Senate wishes to recognize the 
	outstanding service rendered the faculty and the University by 
	the work of Madeline Schatz as she concludes her term as 
	president; now 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the UAF Faculty Senate 
	acknowledges the many contributions of Madeline Schatz and 
	expresses its appreciation for her exemplary service.




The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


			RESOLUTION  OF  APPRECIATION

					FOR

				CLIFTON A. LANDO


WHEREAS, Clif Lando has for many years served the UAF Faculty and 
	merits the greatest admiration and respect of that faculty; and

WHEREAS, Clif Lando has served on the Fairbanks Assembly from 
	1978-1980, as a member of the Academic Council from 1979-
	1980, chaired the Baccalaureate Sub-Committee from 1978-
	1980; and

WHEREAS, Clif Lando has served as a Senator on the UAF Faculty 
	Senate from 1992-1994, as Chair of the Curricular Affairs 
	Committee from 1992-1994, on the Administrative Committee 
	from 1992-1994; and

WHEREAS, Clif Lando has served as an alternate on the UAF Faculty 
	Senate from 1996-1997, and again as a Senator from 1997-
	1999, as a member of the Graduate and Professional Curricular 
	Affairs Committee from 1997-1999; and

WHEREAS, Clif Lando has served UAF and its faculty as Head of the 
	Department of Mathematical Sciences, Acting Dean of the 
	College of Liberal Arts, and in other capacities too numerous 
	to enumerate; and

WHEREAS, On the occasion of his retirement, the UAF Faculty Senate 
	wishes to recognize the outstanding service rendered the 
	faculty and the University by the work of Clif Lando; now

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the UAF Faculty Senate 
	acknowledges the many contributions of Clif Lando and 
	expresses its appreciation for his exemplary service.





The UAF Faculty Senate passed the following at its Meeting #88 on 
May 3, 1999:


			RESOLUTION  OF  APPRECIATION

					FOR

				MAYNARD  G. PERKINS

Whereas, Maynard Perkins served on the UAF Assembly from 1989-
	1990; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins served as an alternate on the UAF Faculty 
	Senate from 1988-1989, and as a Senator from 1989-1999, 
	this being the longest consecutive term of any Senate member 
	to date; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins served on the UAF Faculty Senate 
	Curricular Affairs Committee from 1989-1999, as chair from 
	1996-1997; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins served on the UAF Faculty Senate 
	Developmental Studies Committee from 1989-1999, as co-
	chair from 1989-1994; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins served on the UAF Faculty Senate 
	Administrative Committee from 1989-1994 and again in 
	1996-1997; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins has been teaching for 22 years, eleven of 
	which have been spent teaching in rural ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ for the 
	ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins excels in the audioconferenced delivery of 
	classes to distant students; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins has successfully worked with students 
	who are considered to be developmentally unprepared to 
	succeed at college level work; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins is highly respected by his colleagues, 
	students and fellow UAF Faculty Senators; and

Whereas, Maynard Perkins will be retiring from UAF at the end of the 
	Spring semester 1999; now 

Therefore Be It Resolved; That the University of ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ Faculty 
	Senate does express its sincere appreciation to Maynard 
	Perkins for his dedicated service to the University of ÀÖ»¢Ö±²¥ 
	Fairbanks, its rural education mission, and the students who 
	have benefited from his untiring quest for excellence.


UA